1792 Full Proof Bourbon Review

Hannah’s 1792 Full Proof Bourbon Review

Original review written August 15, 2020

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

The nose of this was fantastic, but sadly – while woody – I felt the palate lacked complexity and there’s a strange aftertaste I can’t seem to shake that I wish I could. 79/100

VITALS:
1792 Full Proof Bourbon Review

– Made In: Kentucky, USA
– Distiller: Barton Distillery
– Classification: Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey; Full Proof
– Age: nas
– Mash Bill: suspected to be Corn=75%; Rye=15%; Malted Barley=10%
– Casks: Char #3.5
– Barrel Entry Proof: 125
– ABV: 62.5% (125 proof)
– Non-chill filtered, however passed through plate and frame filters
– Price: $47.95 USD in Idaho

*Visit 1792bourbon.com for more information

ENJOYMENT METHOD:

I enjoyed the juice neat from a Glencairn glass with father and fellow Whiskey for the Ages reviewer, Brian.

Check out his review for this bourbon here!

SETTING:

Have this one at a pumpkin patch on a warm, autumn day. The smell of hay and jug of apple cider in the central tenet (you know the one) will couple with the aftertaste well enough. Chat with other pumpkin patch goers and be sure to show off the perfect pumpkin you found!

Photo by Timothy Eberly on Unsplash

NOSE:

Sweet, but inoffensive, caramel greets the nose first, with a dusty corn not far behind. Despite being 125 proof, the alcohol is not harsh, rather mixing with a white pepper and rye for a pleasant heat. This smells aged, with a buttery oak and seasoned leather inviting me to take a sip. There is also a nutty element; however, I can’t pinpoint the type. All I can say is that it’s soft and not bitter in the slightest.

Further draws coax out a brown sugar/maple combo that is warm and cozy. This combo, along with the aforementioned caramel, I can visualize a coating a subtly-flavored apple. Other than that, not much in the way of fruit is obvious.

PALATE:
1792 Full Proof Bourbon Review

– Mouth Feel: Soft and light. Not much grit or fire at all.
– Balance: Heavy on the woodiness (but a light wood) with little else contributing to complexity.
– Visual: Tawny in color, there is a lingering crown, but minimal legs.

– Taste: A pop of heat and alcohol hit the tongue on the first sip, but it dissipates quickly. The heat is peppery, with definite rye notes. I find a light caramel flavor or maybe even a vanilla, but the dominating flavor to me seems woody… yet a weak wood. Yes, there’s new oak, but I’d also say that it’s quite piney.

The apple (red delicious I’ve decided) is still here, but I have to really hunt for it. I will also say that while the heat initially explodes, and the wood is present, it then falls a little flat with not a lot of complexity to be found. Occasionally, I’ll find a stray dark fruit, but is vanishes so quickly, I can’t identify it. Perhaps cherry?

A Kentucky chew definitely pulls out additional flavors: definitely cherry, white pepper and vanilla. It’s a great flavor combination – one that is always a win for me. However, I wish I didn’t have to feel the intensified alcohol burn of a Kentucky chew to get it.

FINISH:

– Lasting Power: Medium. There’s an aftertaste, but not much else. The lasting power after a Kentucky chew is longer, but the warmth only lingers on the sides of the tongue and nowhere else.
– Between Sips: Overripe apple with a grassy component lingers between sips. I wish I could say I liked it a lot, but I suppose it’s tolerable.

– No More: Cherries and a bit more warmth come out of the glass the further I go, but ultimately, I’m still not very impressed. The aftertaste of the apple and grass won’t go away, but other than that… dare I say that this a boring pour? Not like any other 125 proof whiskey I’ve had.

The empty Glencairn is a soft and buttery oak. Man, would I have loved to get this level of woody intensity in the taste. The woodiness in the empty glass is at least 5x stronger than in the palate itself.

WORTH THE PRICE?

Barton products, for me, have always been a hit or a miss. While 1792 Full Proof Bourbon isn’t a terrible pour, I find it somewhat boring, and I don’t think I would repurchase at the price found in Idaho.

RATING: 79/100

Click to see Hannah’s rating process

To access other whiskies with this rating, click 79/100.
Click 1792 Barton to see other whiskies from this distillery.

Hannah’s Whiskey Reviews
Whiskey Reviews

1792 Full Proof Bourbon Review

Brian’s 1792 Full Proof Bourbon Review:

15-August-2020

Review Preperation Notes: I poured off 2 oz. from the neck of the newly opened bottle.  I then alternate poured review portions into two Glencairns.  The pours rested for 10 minutes before the review began.

1792 FULL PROOF BOURBON REVIEW:

While 1792 Full Proof lights up sinuses with alcohol vapors, any bold aromas usually sensed in a high proof bourbon are muted.  In the mouth the liquid is both buttery and gritty and my tongue tingles with an aggressive Kentucky Chew.  The flavors aren’t complex — but there’s a lot of subtlety in each sip and the finish is long and warm.

1792 FULL PROOF VITAL STATS:
1792 Full Proof Review

– Region: Kentucky, USA
– Distiller: Barton Distillery
– Mashbill: 75% Corn, 15% Rye, and 10% Barley
– Cask: New-Charred Oak
– Barrel Char Level: #3.5
– Barrel Entry Proof: 125
– ABV: 62.5% (125 proof)
– Age: nas (Prior to 2013, all bottles were labeled as aged for eight years. 1792 no longer prints age statements on their bottles.)
– According to internet searches and reports, 1792 Full Proof is not chill filtered, but passes through plate and frame filters.
– Availability: Limited Releases each year
– Price: $47.95 USD in Idaho (Feb 2020)

1792 Full Proof is not bottled at the strength it comes out of the barrel, but rather at the original 125 proof it went into the barrel. Therefore water is added to lower the bottle ABV.

Learn more at 1792bourbon.com.

ENJOYMENT METHOD:

For the evaluation, I enjoyed the juice neat from Glencairn glasses with my daughter and fellow Whiskey for the Ages reviewer Hannah.

Check out her review for this bourbon here!

NOSE:

When brought to the nose for the initial waft, strong ethanol alcohol gives the olfactories more than a little burn.  After regaining control, fermented tannins and flowering fruit trees mix with dusty roasted corn and and an ever so faint essence of mint.  Any fruitiness comes across as apricot and fresh candied orange zest which blend into allspice, powdered ginger, rye and vanilla custard in a crumbled graham cracker crust.  Still, all aromas are faint and finish with simple syrup, light brown sugar and light oak.

PALATE:

The first sips bite the lips and tongue with a quick burn.  I also taste the tannins and fruit tree blossoms along with the roasted corn sensed on the nose.  There are also hints of dried dark fruits and candied citrus which blend into briny black pepper and rye.  While not a particularly sweet bourbon, 1792 Full Proof does have nearly hidden elements of light vanilla, an essence of maple flavoring and faint stale pop rocks candy.  There are also traces of toasted pecan, seasoned oak, and barrel spice.

1792 Full Proof Review

Balance, Body, Feel and Look:
I would have to report 1792 Full Proof is well balanced but it is also quite boring with little complexity in its taste.  There is a coppery tickle in the mouth, like sucking on a penny. The juice is a bit rough and gritty but at same time buttery.  After each sip, the liquid in the glass falls in sheets, breaking into fast falling legs to return to the tawny colored pool and an ill defined crown does cling inside the Glencairn.

FINISH:

For me, 1792 Full Proof has a long simple finish; its lingering warmth and the occasional trace of maraschino cherry are all that remain in the sip.  As the dram is drawn down, oak begins to waft from the Glencairn but it too is faint and quite weak.

MY RATING: 82/100

Will I seek out this whiskey in the future? No
Click to read Brian’s scoring process.

To access other whiskeys with this score, click 82/100.
Click 1792 Barton to see other whiskies from this distillery.

WHISKEY TRAITS AND FLAVOR NOTES AND PROFILE GRAPH:
1792 Full Proof Review
1792 Full Proof Review

Back to …

Brian’s Whiskey Reviews
Individual Reviews

The Whiskey Value Conundrum

The Whiskey Value Conundrum

Hello, Sippers! Hope you are doing well and enjoying nothing but exceptional pours.

While reading my dad’s Whiskey Availability and Marketing series, a couple of thoughts came to mind, and I thought this post would be a nice followup to his series, adding an additional wrinkle or two to your whiskey enjoyment.

What does value mean when it comes to whiskey?

AND maybe more importantly, how can one define a personal sense of value when making purchases?

Of course, there’s the straightforward answer regarding supply and demand, which was covered in Dad’s three-part discussion. And it certainly all makes sense! Stores, chains, states and even countries are relegated to limited allocations of certain brands and products, making them readily available or perhaps more of the unicorn variety.

All of the above is well and good, but what about you, the consumer? This is what I call the “Whiskey Value Conundrum.” Just because something is readily available does not always translate to being a good pour or lessen its value. Even some of the whiskeys you can find on the upper shelves have their pitfalls and may not be worth a purchase.

The Whiskey Value Conundrum

Photo by Micheile Henderson on Unsplash

So, how do you know you’re getting a good value? Or rather, how do you learn? (Un)fortunately, there is a bit of necessary trial and error involved here to discern your own tastes and what you like. And admittedly, I think defining value is always going to be a subjective enterprise.

Regardless, you’ll still find hundreds of articles, with the “Top 10 Best Value” or something of the like on the internet. There are a few regulars on such lists, (e.g. Eagle Rare Ten Year, Elijah Craig Small Batch, Basil Hayden’s Straight Kentucky Bourbon, etc.), and they all hover at around the same price point $20-$40 USD (in Idaho). These are also readily available in Idaho as well, but to me, this still doesn’t solve this Whiskey Value Conundrum.

We know the “$” sign is the most basic unit of value, so if I am picking up a $20-30 product, I have to ask, “What am I expecting from this bottle?” not, “Will this be a diamond in the rough?” Temper expectations when buying an inexpensive whiskey, but don’t be afraid to create a standard when you’re dishing out more coin.

Deriving Value from Price: $20-30

Using the $20-30 bottle as an example, here’s some of what I, personally, anticipate and expect:

At least one major flavor profile (e.g. fruit, spice, bread, oak, etc.) to come through as the hero. … I do like more complex whiskeys, but I don’t expect such complexity in a pour at this price point. You wouldn’t expect a kindergartner to know middle school math, right?
A low proof of between 80 and 90. … $20-30 bottles are meant – more often than not – to be readily available. To have enough product, the distillery might not age the whiskey much longer than the minimum requirements (in the case of bourbon, a minimum of two years). It will likely be watered down, lowering the proof, significantly lower than the Barrel Entry Proof.
Straight/Blended. … Meaning, I’m not expecting “Small Batch” or “Single Barrel” material here. I’ll take the general blend of a rickhouse at this price without complaint.
Sourced. … If this is a blend of whiskeys from across the country or is sourced, I’m not bothered at all at a $20-30 price. Again, remember, availability is the crux of the products at this price, so if this is the best way to guarantee product to the consumer, so be it.
General mellowness. … Not just in the flavor profiles or with the alcohol heat, but even in the finish.
An easy sipper! … This one may be the most important and discerning factor to me specifically. $20-30 bottles are ones that I’ll most often have at a gathering where I don’t have to focus too much on picking and poking at complexity. This also means that I don’t want to find a flavor that sticks out like a sore thumb, and makes me look for a glass of water to cleanse my palate.

I can and do seek out $20-30 bottles from time to time, and can find excellent value in them! If I find one with more complexity or 90+ proof, then its value increases for me because it exceeds my expectations. Just as long as the product meets my basic requirements, I’m not upset at the price and can often be convinced to purchase again, because they do offer their own unique value as my easy sippers.

Whiskey Value
Whiskey Value

That being said, and if you’re curious…

Eagle Rare Ten Year, Elijah Craig Small Batch, Gentleman Jack Tennessee Whisky, Maker’s Mark, and Tincup American Whiskey are a few which either meet or exceed my expectations for this category. Notice the increased age in the Eagle Rare, and the Small Batch classification in the Elijah Craig. That doesn’t mean that the standard Maker’s, blended Tincup, or heavily advertised Gentleman Jack don’t carry their weight and impart their own value.


Deriving Value from Price: $60-80

But what about when I’m splurging? What if, say, I want to spend $60-80? What am I expecting in a pour from one of these bottles?

Complex flavor profile. … Continuing with the earlier analogy, we’re in not in kindergarten anymore. I’d say we’re at high school – if not college – level now. I want to smell and taste a set of diverse aromas and flavors in the whiskey I’m sipping. The blend here is key.
90+ proof. … I want to know this is a special whiskey. Show me this by not cutting it down, or by letting it age longer. And on that note…
Age statement. … I want to see how much energy and time was put into this bottle. Specifically, I’d like to know that it’s had plenty of time in the barrel to become the best version of itself as possible. If there isn’t an age statement, then I’d like to at least see a darker color in the whiskey itself, especially in bourbon, to show off its age a little.
Small Batch/Single Barrel Designation. … Again, this is supposed to be special and maybe even have a little bit of mystery about it, like when you choose a “Name Brand” product over “Generic.” If it’s “Straight” or “Blended,” then why is this unique enough to be priced at $60-80 (or more)? When I hear “Straight” or “Blended,” I think “Generic,” even when it’s not sourced. I’m wanting the metaphorical “Name Brand” here.
One distiller. … Unless this is a unique collaboration of well-known distilleries, I want one name to take accountability and responsibility of the product. This is their pride and joy, the whiskey they alone raised to maturation. Own it.
Frills. … What do I mean by this? Well, this could be anything from a fluffy back story and/or fancy packaging or bottling. Note – this doesn’t mean anything about the quality of the whiskey, which is where the value truly is. But at $60-80, again – this is the pride and joy; it’s okay to be dressed up a little bit for graduation. But this is not and should never be a deal breaker. Frills are something to anticipate, not demand.
Warmth! … For me, this is the most important part of whiskeys in this price range. I’m not looking for an easy sipper anymore. Now, I want to feel something special. I want that pause button that you hear my dad and I talk so much about. If I can’t enjoy this with peace and quiet or maybe with one or two people, it’s not worth it. Plain and simple.

Exceeding my expectations is trickier when we hit this price category; however, it can be done. Most often, it is where the proof is concerned. If I’m tasting something that is high proof (115+), and the alcohol burn is surprisingly subtle, I’m more impressed with the whiskey, and its value increases. Likewise, sometimes the blends are just out of this world, or the overall warmth or vibe is just a bit stronger than others.

As you can see, there’s a bit more subjectivity when it comes to exceeding expectations in this category, so that’s where you, the consumer, can really ask what’s most important to you and play around with it a little.

Whiskey Value
Whiskey Value

Thankfully, in this price range, there are still options which can either meet or exceed my lofty expectations. Again, if you’re curious…

Blanton’s Single Barrel, Booker’s Country Ham Small Batch (or any Booker’s really), Colonel E.H. Taylor Small Batch, Old Forester 1920, and Stagg Jr. Batch #12 are just some of my favorites. Notice the frills on the Blanton’s and Booker’s bottles, and the back story for the Booker’s, Old Forester and Colonel Taylor. But also recognize the simplicity of the Stagg Jr. in its packaging and presentation. It’s not all in the look!


You’ll notice that I skipped a couple of price ranges here: $30-60 and $80+. I did this purposefully.

I think that in the $30-60 range, where we as customers (notice I didn’t say consumers here), are willing to bend our wallets a bit. We can get talked into things in this range, so the Whiskey Value Conundrum is even more confusing. I would argue subjectivity is strongest in this category, and even I bend a bit on occasion.

So, what’s a sipper to do? My recommendation: pick two or three expectations (not anticipations) from the $20-30 category and another two or three non-contradicting expectations from the $60-80 category. Make sure they are the most important ones for you, not for anyone else. If you’re being talked into trying something, make sure you stick to your value points.

At anything more expensive than $80, acknowledge that you are going to be paying in part for the name on the bottle and in part for limited availability or rarity. Check reviews from people who have similar tastes or values to you. Do your research: what is supposed to make this particular bottle not just special, but EXTRA special.

And recognize that it’s okay, and even expected, to change your values for a whiskey at any price. Those new values can be incredibly subjective to your own unique whiskey experience, hence why I am not going into my expectations here. (Though, if you ask me, paying more than $80 for a whiskey is unnecessary as I can personally find all of my value needs met in lower price brackets, but I’m not here to judge you.)


And thus, the Whiskey Value Conundrum.

Spend some time defining your values for certain price brackets; they don’t even have to be the same brackets that I created here. You’ll notice our Whiskey by Price page actually has different brackets all together for the simple reason that price does not always equal value and vice versa.

Whiskey is and has always been a subjective enterprise, and if your experience isn’t enjoyable, then what’s the point?

These are just a few of the values I have for my whiskeys which you can mix, match, use, or throw out the window. If they help you in your Whiskey Value Conundrum, wonderful! If not, well, maybe they can assist you in thinking about what value means to you and give you a springboard to create or understand your own values a bit better.

What are your Whiskey Values? Let us know in the comment field below!

Written by Hannah Dawson

WhiskeyfortheAges.com editor

Back to …

The Sip – Whiskey Articles
Whiskey Reviews

Featured Photo by Micheile Henderson on Unsplash